We have all found ourselves in the position of reviewing an MSB Building Valuation and comparing it to a building's current valuation on the policy. While the policy reflects the building valuation as replacement cost, the insurance policy actually responds providing a reconstruction cost. What’s the difference you ask?
Replacement cost is defined as the cost to construct or replace an entire building with equal quality and construction. A replacement cost does not include site improvements, demolition, debris removal, fees, premium material costs and other costs associated with the construction process. Replacement cost also assumes that current building material, design or layout will be available and used.
Reconstruction cost is defined as the cost to replicate the building, at current construction prices, using the like kind and quality materials, construction standards, design, layout and quality. The MSB reconstruction cost includes additional expenses related to repair and restoration contractors’ fees, the construction process itself, the location of the property, demolition costs and debris removal. These factors create a valuation that is higher than a new construction.
A cost provided by a builder for new construction will not include items provided for and included as property items within the ISO Commercial Property form (CP0010). The MSB Rating system is programmed with these additional costs.
If you have questions about your Commercial Insurance Policy, contact a knowledgebroker at R&R.

Does your organization desire the freedom of a self-funded insurance plan, but need a little more certainty for budgeting concerns? If so, level funding might be the answer to your employee benefits questions.
We are frequently asked "Who is covered under our commercial general liability policy?"
Is your organization taking advantage of the numerous ways to save money on health insurance? Are you looking to reduce your insurance premiums?
While we all hope to avoid accidents or the need to report an insurance claim, it is important to understand the process if/when a situation occurs. Below are step-by-step instructions to help you navigate the road to reporting a claim.
Back in 2012, Coca-Cola was hit with a $24 Million distracted driving judgment. The plaintiff’s attorneys were able to successfully argue that Coca Cola’s cell policy for drivers was "vague and ambiguous." They also suggested that Coca-Cola was aware of the dangers but withheld this information from its employee driver, which led directly to the circumstances that caused the accident. The jury awarded $14 million in actual damages and another $10 in punitive damages to a woman hit by a Coca-Cola truck driver who was chatting on her cell phone.
In an effort to align with national insurance rating, the Wisconsin Commissioner of Insurance is eliminating the “Anniversary Rating Date” effective May 1, 2017. What does this mean for Wisconsin employers? You no longer need to wait for your effective date to take advantage of new rates.
Steve and Julia are a couple in their late 50’s whose children have started promising professional careers and live independently. They have two vehicles and live in a newly constructed home in Waukesha, WI. They also have a second home in Minocqua, WI with a boat and boat house. Both Steve and Julia serve on various boards and are active volunteers in their community. Their previous insurance plan exhibited many of the typical patterns of overpaying and underinsuring for their homeowner, auto, valuables, boat and umbrella liability coverages. Steve and Julia significantly improved their financial security while reducing their total premium 18% by rebalancing their program as follows:
It’s not something that most people think about, but just like your business, NFL teams also have to purchase worker’s compensation insurance for their employees. And just like the benefits that are afforded your employees, football players are covered for lost wages, medical treatment, loss of earnings, etc. 